November 8, 2014
Journal: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Short Title: Dermatology: future therapeutic perspectives
Alternate Journal: Dermatology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8210 (Print)
Accession Number: 24297646
Notes: Warren, Richard B
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2013 Dec;3(2):115-6. doi: 10.1007/s13555-013-0037-7. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
Author Address: The Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Reference Type: Journal Article
Record Number: 4521Author: Watson, A. J., Redbord, K., Taylor, J. S., Shippy, A., Kostecki, J. and Swerlick, R.
Title: Medical error in dermatology practice: development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts
Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol
Short Title: Medical error in dermatology practice: development of a classification system to drive priority setting in patient safety efforts
Alternate Journal: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787 (Electronic)
Accession Number: 23360864
Biopsy/standards/statistics & numerical data
Dermatology/*standards/*statistics & numerical data
*Health Care Surveys
Medical Errors/*classification/*statistics & numerical data
Medication Errors/classification/statistics & numerical data
Practice Guidelines as Topic
*Quality of Health Care
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To date, no study to our knowledge has examined the nature and scope of medical error in dermatology practice. OBJECTIVE: We sought to collect and categorize physician-reported errors in dermatology practice. METHODS: A survey regarding most recent and most serious errors was developed and distributed to dermatologists attending US meetings. A total of 150 responses were received outlining 152 most recent errors and 130 most serious errors. Survey responses, along with classification systems for other specialties, were used to develop a classification system for medical error in dermatology. RESULTS: The respondents’ demographics reflected the specialty: 63% were male, 60% were older than 50 years, and 60% were in solo or group private practice. Of the most recent errors reported, 85% happened once a year or less, and 86% did not result in harm to patients. The most common categories of both most recent and most serious errors were related to assessment (41% and 31%, respectively) and interventions (44% and 52%, respectively). Assessment errors were primarily related to investigations, and commonly involved the biopsy pathway. Intervention errors in the most recent and most serious errors were split between those related to medication (54% and 27%) and those related to procedures (46% and 73%). Of note, 5 and 21 wrong-site surgeries were reported in the most recent and most serious errors groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Our findings are subject to respondent and recall bias and our classification system, although an important first step, is likely incomplete. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight several key areas of patient care in need of safety initiatives, namely the biopsy pathway, medication management, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.