Dermatology 2013

Notes: Li, Jane

Chong, Alvin H

Green, Jack

Kelly, Robert

Baker, Christopher

eng

Australia

2013/04/12 06:00

Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;54(4):296-302. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12042. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23574297

Author Address: Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

 

 

Reference Type:  Journal Article

Record Number: 4562Author: Li, J., Li, Q. L., Li, J., Chen, M. L., Xie, H. F., Li, Y. P. and Chen, X.

Year: 2013

Title: Comparison of three problem-based learning conditions (real patients, digital and paper) with lecture-based learning in a dermatology course: a prospective randomized study from China

Journal: Med Teach

Volume: 35

Issue: 2

Pages: e963-70

Short Title: Comparison of three problem-based learning conditions (real patients, digital and paper) with lecture-based learning in a dermatology course: a prospective randomized study from China

Alternate Journal: Medical teacher

ISSN: 1466-187X (Electronic)

0142-159X (Linking)

DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.719651

Accession Number: 23009254

Keywords: China

Clinical Competence

Computer Simulation

Consumer Satisfaction

*Dermatology

Education, Medical, Undergraduate/*methods

Humans

Patients

Physical Examination

Problem-Based Learning/*methods

Prospective Studies

Students, Medical/*psychology

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The precise effect and the quality of different cases used in dermatology problem-based learning (PBL) curricula are yet unclear. AIM: To prospectively compare the impact of real patients, digital, paper PBL (PPBL) and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) on academic results and student perceptions. METHODS: A total of 120 students were randomly allocated into either real-patients PBL (RPBL) group studied via real-patient cases, digital PBL (DPBL) group studied via digital-form cases, PPBL group studied via paper-form cases, or conventional group who received didactic lectures. Academic results were assessed through review of written examination, objective structured clinical examination and student performance scores. A five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used to evaluate student perceptions. RESULTS: Compared to those receiving lectures only, all PBL participants had better results for written examination, clinical examination and overall performance. Students in RPBL group exhibited better overall performance than those in the other two PBL groups. Real-patient cases were more effective in helping develop students’ self-directed learning skills, improving their confidence in future patient encounters and encouraging them to learn more about the discussed condition, compared to digital and paper cases. CONCLUSION: Both real patient and digital triggers are helpful in improving students’ clinical problem-handling skills. However, real patients provide greater benefits to students.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295