Cardiology 2013 (Full reference info)

Reference Type: Journal Article
Record Number: 390Author: Kern, M. J., Applegate, R. J., Bell, M., Brilakis, E. S., Butman, S. M., Bach, R. G., Kaul, P., Klein, L. W., Krucoff, M. W., Moore, J. A., Price, M. J., Rao, S. V., Stone, G. W. and Uretsky, B. F.
Year: 2013
Title: Conversations in Cardiology: Bridging antiplatelet therapy before surgery
Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Date: Dec 13
Short Title: Conversations in Cardiology: Bridging antiplatelet therapy before surgery
Alternate Journal: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X (Electronic)
1522-1946 (Linking)
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25319
Accession Number: 24395180
Abstract: Bridging for antiplatelet therapy remains a subject of debate with data favoring GP blockers but at a risk of bleeding. This Conversation in Cardiology addresses a key and often asked question about use of alternatives to P2Y12 agents in patients requiring surgery within 6 months after drug eluting stent implantation. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Notes: Kern, Morton J
Applegate, Robert J
Bell, Malcolm
Brilakis, Emmanouil S
Butman, Samuel M
Bach, Richard G
Kaul, Prashant
Klein, Lloyd W
Krucoff, Mitchell W
Moore, Joseph A
Price, Matthew J
Rao, Sunil V
Stone, Gregg W
Uretsky, Barry F
ENG
2014/01/08 06:00
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec 13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25319.
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395180
Author Address: University California Irvine, Chief Cardiology, Long Beach Veterans Administration Heath Care System, Long Beach, California; University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California.

Reference Type: Journal Article
Record Number: 828Author: Kesavachandran, C. N., Haamann, F. and Nienhaus, A.
Year: 2013
Title: Radiation exposure and adverse health effects of interventional cardiology staff
Journal: Rev Environ Contam Toxicol
Volume: 222
Pages: 73-91
Short Title: Radiation exposure and adverse health effects of interventional cardiology staff
Alternate Journal: Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology
ISSN: 0179-5953 (Print)
0179-5953 (Linking)
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4717-7_2
Accession Number: 22990945
Keywords: Cardiology/*manpower
Humans
*Occupational Exposure
*Radiation, Ionizing
Abstract: To the best of our knowledge, this chapter constitutes the first systematic review of radiation exposure to eyes, thyroid, and hands for Interventional Cardiology (IC) staff. We have concluded from our review that these anatomical locations are likely to be exposed to radiation as a result of the limited use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among IC staff as shown in Fig. 8. Our review also reveals that, with the exception of three eye exposure cases, the annual radiation dose to eyes, thyroid, and hands among IC staff was within recommended levels and limits. The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) limit was not achieved in three cases for fingers/hands and four cases for eyes. However, an increased incidence of cataracts were reported for IC staff, and this gives rise to the concern that low-dose or unnoticed exposures may increase the risk of developing cataracts among cardiology staff. Clearly, the formation of cataracts among IC staff may be an issue and should be studied in more depth. Our review also disclosed that the two groups who receive excessive radiation doses (i.e., exceed the recommended limit) are physicians-in-training and junior staff physicians who work in cardiac catheterization laboratories. In particular, more attention should be given to assessing the effects of radiation exposure among IC staff who work in the Asia Pacific countries, because our review indicates that the number of IC procedures performed by IC staff in these countries is higher than for other continents. There is a huge demand for procedures conducted by IC staff in the Asia-Pacific area, for both treating patients and consulting with specialists. Our review also disclosed that recommended limits for per-procedure radiation doses are needed for IC staff. We recommend that such limits be established by the appropriate national and international agencies that are responsible for occupational radiation exposure. Although our review indicates that the current precautions against LDR exposure for IC staff are adequate in most cases, we are concerned about the relatively high incidence of cataracts reported to exist among IC staff. Therefore, we believe that there is a need for a strict implementation of radiation safety practices in cardiology laboratories and associated workplaces that utilize radiation. The action that is most important for protecting staff in the workplace against radiation exposure is the regular use of personal protective equipment or shielding. Working at a safe distance from instruments and assuring that such instruments are in the proper position are other techniques that can reduce the radiation dose received by IC staff.
Notes: Kesavachandran, Chandrasekharan Nair
Haamann, Frank
Nienhaus, Albert
eng
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t
Review
2012/09/20 06:00
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;222:73-91.
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990945
Author Address: Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in the Nursing Profession (CV care), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. ckesavac@uke.uni-hamburg.de

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155