Cardiology 2013. Part II.

Notes: Yates, Martin T

Soppa, Gopal K R

Valencia, Oswaldo

Jones, Sion

Firoozi, Sami

Jahangiri, Marjan

eng

2013/02/14 06:00

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23402690

Author Address: Departments of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, St George’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Departments of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, St George’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: marjan.jahangiri@stgeorges.nhs.uk.

 

 

Reference Type:  Journal Article

Record Number: 1087Author: Yu, Q., Shao, H. and Duan, Z.

Year: 2013

Title: The research collaboration in Chinese cardiology and cardiovasology field

Journal: Int J Cardiol

Volume: 167

Issue: 3

Pages: 786-91

Date: Aug 10

Short Title: The research collaboration in Chinese cardiology and cardiovasology field

Alternate Journal: International journal of cardiology

ISSN: 1874-1754 (Electronic)

0167-5273 (Linking)

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.019

Accession Number: 22456262

Abstract: BACKGROUND: China has become the world’s second-largest economy after the United States since 2010. The cardiovascular diseases in have deteriorated significantly in resent 20 years. There is few published report about collaboration in Chinese Cardiology and Cardiovasology (C&C) field so far. The current study reveals the status of the collaboration activities in Chinese C&C field. METHODS: Articles published in 5 journals related to C&C from 2000 to 2010 were retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP Journal Integration Platform(VJIP). Methods such as co-authorship, co-word analysis, centrality, k-core, m-slice were used in this study. RESULTS: Although the percentage of co-authored papers and the average number of authors per paper in Chinese C&C field were generally increasing, the geographic distribution of the research collaboration activities was extremely uneven. There were 87 authors and 5 institutions ranking in top 1% of all the three centralities but 92.8% authors belonged to 10-Core and below. 90.93% authors are among 1-slice, 2-slice and 3-slice. We found 63 cohesive research groups in the focuses of research collaboration for Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, etc. CONCLUSION: The government should provide important role in supporting or encouraging the research collaboration among different regional areas. Based on the author ranking in the centralities, we will be able to select academic leaders more easily. The research studies in the field of collaboration network will provide important role to assist researchers to master the forefront research subjects, and to help research scientists to apply for scientific project funding.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205