Cardiology 2013

Notes: Borozanov, V

eng

Macedonia

2013/08/08 06:00

Prilozi. 2013;34(1):45-54.

URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23921478

Author Address: University Cardiology Clinic, Medical Faculty, Skopje, R. Macedonia.

 

 

Reference Type:  Journal Article

Record Number: 610Author: Borracci, R. A., Giorgi, M. A., Giorgi, G., Daru, V., Manente, D., Tajer, C. D. and Doval, H. C.

Year: 2013

Title: [Diffusion and adoption of health care innovations in cardiology, in Argentina]

Journal: Rev Med Chil

Volume: 141

Issue: 1

Pages: 49-57

Date: Jan

Short Title: [Diffusion and adoption of health care innovations in cardiology, in Argentina]

Alternate Journal: Revista medica de Chile

ISSN: 0717-6163 (Electronic)

0034-9887 (Linking)

DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872013000100007

Original Publication: Perfil de difusion y adopcion de innovaciones de los cardiologos en Argentina.

Accession Number: 23732414

Keywords: Argentina

*Attitude of Health Personnel

*Cardiology

*Diffusion of Innovation

Health Care Surveys

Humans

Social Networking

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Medicine is changing rapidly and diagnostic and therapeutic innovations are common. Not all professionals adopt these innovations in the same way. Aim: To survey the physicians’ opinions on adopting innovations in cardiovascular health care, to classify individuals from an innovative to a conservative behavior, and to individualize opinion leaders among them, in order to build a social network of influence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November and December 2008, 765 Argentine cardiologists were surveyed via e-mail in Argentina, to assess the way they adopt and disseminate innovations in cardiovascular health care. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 537 professionals (70.2%). Fifty three percent of respondents were “Early adopters”. However, 63 to 79.3% of respondents preferred to wait for a full demonstration of the usefulness of innovation before adopting it. The opinion leaders’ distribution adopted a scale-free network pattern, where few leaders had many connections and influence on the whole network. The giant component of the network included 41% of physicians; growth simulation of the network showed that the four most popular leaders influenced over 44% of the giant component. CONCLUSIONS: Among surveyed physicians there was an attitude towards rapid acceptance of innovations in health care. However, when analyzing the direct opinion of physicians, most cases preferred usefulness demonstrated before accepting innovations. The social network including respondents and opinion leaders showed a scale-free topology with a big influence of a few over the whole network.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208