Cardiology 2013

Notes: Balwanz, Christopher R

Javed, Usman

Singh, Gagan D

Armstrong, Ehrin J

Southard, Jeffrey A

Wong, Garrett B

Yeo, Khung Keong

Low, Reginald I

Laird, John R Jr

Rogers, Jason H

eng

2013/03/05 06:00

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23453098

Author Address: Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.

 

 

Reference Type:  Journal Article

Record Number: 520Author: Bank, A. J., Obetz, C., Konrardy, A., Khan, A., Pillai, K. M., McKinley, B. J., Gage, R. M., Turnbull, M. A. and Kenney, W. O.

Year: 2013

Title: Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: a prospective study

Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res

Volume: 5

Pages: 399-406

Short Title: Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: a prospective study

Alternate Journal: ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR

ISSN: 1178-6981 (Electronic)

1178-6981 (Linking)

DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S49010

PMCID: 3745291

Accession Number: 23966799

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Scribes have been used in the emergency department to improve physician productivity and patient interaction. There are no controlled, prospective studies of scribe use in the clinic setting. METHODS: A prospective controlled study compared standard visits (20 minute follow-up and 40 minute new patient) to a scribe system (15 minute follow-up and 30 minute new patient) in a cardiology clinic. Physician productivity, patient satisfaction, physician-patient interaction, and revenue were measured. RESULTS: Four physicians saw 129 patients using standard care and 210 patients with scribes during 65 clinic hours each. Patients seen per hour increased (P < 0.001) from 2.2 +/- 0.3 to 3.5 +/- 0.4 (59% increase) and work relative value units (wRVU) per hour increased (P < 0.001) from 3.5 +/- 1.3 to 5.5 +/- 1.3 (57% increase). Patient satisfaction was high at baseline and unchanged with scribes. In a substudy, direct patient contact time was lower (9.1 +/- 2.0 versus 12.9 +/- 3.4 minutes; P < 0.01) for scribe visits, but time of patient interaction (without computer) was greater (6.7 +/- 2.1 versus 1.5 +/- 1.9 minutes; P < 0.01). Subjective assessment of physician-patient interaction (1-10) was higher (P < 0.01) on scribe visits (9.1 +/- 0.9 versus 7.9 +/- 1.1). Direct and indirect (downstream) revenue per patient seen was $142 and $2,398, with $205,740 additional revenue generated from the 81 additional patients seen with scribes. CONCLUSION: Using scribes in a cardiology clinic is feasible, produces improvements in physician-patient interaction, and results in large increases in physician productivity and system cardiovascular revenue.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208